Published

Every Project I've Done Has Been a Collaboration — So Why Does the Portfolio Say 'I'?

Every Project I've Done Has Been a Collaboration — So Why Does the Portfolio Say 'I'?

If you look at my portfolio you'll see case studies written in the first person. I identified the problem. I conducted the research. I designed the solution. I've been building this out during my last year of school and I keep running into this uncomfortable gap between what the format requires and what I actually believe about where work comes from.

I'm not sure I've ever had a truly original idea. That's not self-deprecation, it's more like the more I think about it the less the concept of individual authorship holds up. Every instinct I bring to a project is downstream of something. A professor who reframed how I think about research. A collaborator who pushed back on a direction I was attached to and turned out to be right. A book I read that gave me a way of thinking about systems I didn't have before. A project that failed and left a residue. The work I make now is in some real sense a accumulation of all of those people and moments, and attributing it cleanly to myself feels like a simplification that borders on dishonest.

Design culture has this romance with the individual visionary, the designer who sees what others don't, who has the taste and the vision and the conviction to bring something into being. And there are people like that, I'm not denying it. But even they are made of influences, of conversations, of the particular moment in culture they happened to be working in. Le Guin didn't invent her worlds from nothing. She was in dialogue with anthropology, with feminism, with the specific anxieties of the twentieth century. What made her singular wasn't that she came from nowhere, it was what she did with everything she'd absorbed.

I think about this with my own work a lot. The projects I'm most proud of are the ones where I can trace the thinking back through multiple people, where I can see the exact moment a collaborator's instinct changed the direction, where the outcome is genuinely not something I would have arrived at alone. That feels like good work to me. But it's also the hardest to write about in a portfolio, because the format wants a protagonist and the truth is more like a conversation that nobody fully controlled.

Maybe the more honest thing to say is that authorship is always retrospective. You make something with other people and then afterward you tell a story about it that has a cleaner shape than the actual process did. I do it, everyone does it, it's probably unavoidable. But I think there's something worth sitting with in the gap between that story and what actually happened, which is that none of us are really working alone, and the influences that shape what we make go back further and run deeper than any case study can hold.

If you look at my portfolio you'll see case studies written in the first person. I identified the problem. I conducted the research. I designed the solution. I've been building this out during my last year of school and I keep running into this uncomfortable gap between what the format requires and what I actually believe about where work comes from.

I'm not sure I've ever had a truly original idea. That's not self-deprecation, it's more like the more I think about it the less the concept of individual authorship holds up. Every instinct I bring to a project is downstream of something. A professor who reframed how I think about research. A collaborator who pushed back on a direction I was attached to and turned out to be right. A book I read that gave me a way of thinking about systems I didn't have before. A project that failed and left a residue. The work I make now is in some real sense a accumulation of all of those people and moments, and attributing it cleanly to myself feels like a simplification that borders on dishonest.

Design culture has this romance with the individual visionary, the designer who sees what others don't, who has the taste and the vision and the conviction to bring something into being. And there are people like that, I'm not denying it. But even they are made of influences, of conversations, of the particular moment in culture they happened to be working in. Le Guin didn't invent her worlds from nothing. She was in dialogue with anthropology, with feminism, with the specific anxieties of the twentieth century. What made her singular wasn't that she came from nowhere, it was what she did with everything she'd absorbed.

I think about this with my own work a lot. The projects I'm most proud of are the ones where I can trace the thinking back through multiple people, where I can see the exact moment a collaborator's instinct changed the direction, where the outcome is genuinely not something I would have arrived at alone. That feels like good work to me. But it's also the hardest to write about in a portfolio, because the format wants a protagonist and the truth is more like a conversation that nobody fully controlled.

Maybe the more honest thing to say is that authorship is always retrospective. You make something with other people and then afterward you tell a story about it that has a cleaner shape than the actual process did. I do it, everyone does it, it's probably unavoidable. But I think there's something worth sitting with in the gap between that story and what actually happened, which is that none of us are really working alone, and the influences that shape what we make go back further and run deeper than any case study can hold.

Next Blog

Next Blog